Aryan HE, Acosta FL Jr, Ames CP (2005) The ProDisc artificial disc: insertion technique. Neurosurg Clin N Am 16(4):651-6

 

Auerbach JD, Ballester CM, Hammond F, Carine ET, Balderston RA, Elliott DM (2010) The effect of implant size and device keel on vertebral compression properties in lumbar total disc replacement. Spine J 10(4):333–40

 

Auerbach JD, Jones KJ, Milby AH, et al. (2009) Segmental contribution toward total lumbar range of motion in disc replacement and fusions: a comparison of operative and adjacent levels. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34(23):2510-7

 

Bendo JA, Quirno M, Errico T, Spivak JM, Goldstein J (2008) A comparison of two retroperitoneal surgical approaches for total disc arthroplasty of the lumbar spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33(2):205-9

 

Bertagnoli R, Kumar S (2002) Indications for full prosthetic disc arthroplasty: a correlation of clinical outcome against a variety of indications. Eur Spine J 11 Suppl 2:S131-6

 

Bertagnoli R, Yue JJ, Fenk-Mayer A, et al. (2006) Treatment of symptomatic adjacent-segment degeneration after lumbar fusion with total disc arthroplasty by using the prodisc prosthesis: a prospective study with 2-year minimum follow up. J Neurosurg Spine 4(2):91-7

 

Bertagnoli R, Yue JJ, Kershaw T, et al. (2006) Lumbar total disc arthroplasty utilizing the ProDisc prosthesis in smokers versus nonsmokers: a prospective study with 2-year minimum follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31(9):992-7

 

Bertagnoli R, Yue JJ, Nanieva R, et al. (2006) Lumbar total disc arthroplasty in patients older than 60 years of age: a prospective study of the ProDisc prosthesis with 2-year minimum follow-up period. J Neurosurg Spine 4(2):85-90

 

Bertagnoli R, Yue JJ, Shah RV, et al. (2005) The treatment of disabling single-level lumbar discogenic low back pain with total disc arthroplasty utilizing the Prodisc prosthesis: a prospective study with 2-year minimum follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30(19):2230-6

 

Bertagnoli R, Yue JJ, Shah RV, et al. (2005) The treatment of disabling multilevel lumbar discogenic low back pain with total disc arthroplasty utilizing the ProDisc prosthesis: a prospective study with 2-year minimum follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30(19):2192-9

 

Cakir B, Schmidt R, Mattes T, et al. (2009) Index level mobility after total lumbar disc replacement: is it beneficial or detrimental? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34(9):917-23

 

Chen SH, Zhong ZC, Chen CS, et al. (2009) Biomechanical comparison between lumbar disc arthroplasty and fusion. Med Eng Phys 31(2):244-53

 

Chen WM, Park C, Lee K, Lee S (2009) In situ contact analysis of the prosthesis components of Prodisc-L in lumbar spine following total disc replacement. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34(20):E716-23

 

Choma TJ, Miranda J, Siskey R, et al. (2009) Retrieval analysis of a ProDisc-L total disc replacement. J Spinal Disord Tech (4):290-6

 

Chung SS, Lee CS, Kang CS (2006) Lumbar total disc replacement using ProDisc II: a prospective study with a 2-year minimum follow-up. J Spinal Disord Tech 19(6):411-5

 

Chung SS, Lee CS, Kang CS, Kim SH (2006) The effect of lumbar total disc replacement on the spinopelvic alignment and range of motion of the lumbar spine. J Spinal Disord Tech 19(5):307-11

 

Chung SK, Kim YE, Wang KC (2009) Biomechanical effect of constraint in lumbar total disc replacement: a study with finite element analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34(12):1281-6

 

Delamarter RB, Bae HW, Pradhan BB (2005) Clinical results of ProDisc-II lumbar total disc replacement: report from the United States clinical trial. Orthop Clin North Am 36(3):301-13

 

Delamarter RB, Fribourg DM, Kanim LE, Bae H (2003) ProDisc artificial total lumbar disc replacement: introduction and early results from the United States clinical trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28(20):S167-75

 

Demetropoulos CK, Sengupta DK, Knaub MA, et al. (2010) Biomechanical evaluation of the kinematics of the cadaver lumbar spine following disc replacement with the ProDisc-L prosthesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35(1):26-31

 

Errico TJ (2005) Lumbar disc arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res (435):106-17

 

Fairbank J (2007) Zigler J, Delamarter R, Spivak J, et al. Results of the prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-L total disc replacement versus circumferential fusion for the treatment of 1-level degenerative disc disease. Spine 2007;32:1155-62. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32(25):2929-30; author reply 2930-1

 

German JW, Foley KT (2005) Disc arthroplasty in the management of the painful lumbar motion segment. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30 (16 Suppl):S60-7

 

Goreham-Voss CM, Hyde PJ, Hall RM, Fisher J, Brown TD (2010) Cross-shear implementation in sliding-distance-coupled finite element analysis of wear in metal-on-polyethylene total joint arthroplasty: Intervertebral total disc replacement as an illustrative application. J Biomech 15:Epub

 

Gstoettner M, Heider D, Liebensteiner M, Bach CM (2008) Footprint mismatch in lumbar total disc arthroplasty. Eur Spine J 17(11):1470-5

 

Gumbs AA, Shah RV, Yue JJ, Sumpio B (2005) The open anterior paramedian retroperitoneal approach for spine procedures. Arch Surg 140(4):339-43

 

Guyer RD, Siddiqui S, Zigler JE, et al. (2008) Lumbar spinal arthroplasty: analysis of one center's twenty best and twenty worst clinical outcomes. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33(23):2566-9

 

Hallab N, Link HD, McAfee PC (2003) Biomaterial optimization in total disc arthroplasty. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28(20):S139-52

 

Hannibal M, Thomas DJ, Low J, et al. (2007) ProDisc-L total disc replacement: a comparison of 1-level versus 2-level arthroplasty patients with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32(21):2322-6

 

Huang RC, Girardi FP, Cammisa Jr FP, et al. (2003) Long-term flexion-extension range of motion of the prodisc total disc replacement. J Spinal Disord Tech 16(5):435-40

 

Jeon SH, Choi WG, Lee SH (2008) Anterior revision of a dislocated ProDisc prosthesis at the L4-5 level. J Spinal Disord Tech 21(6):448-50

Käfer W, Clessienne CB, Däxle M, et al. (2008) Posterior component impingement after lumbar total disc replacement: a radiographic analysis of 66 ProDisc-L prostheses in 56 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33(22):2444-9

 

Karatoprak O, Aydoğan M, Oztürk C, et al. (2007) Total disc prosthesis for painful degenerative lumbar disc disease. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 41(4):281-5

 

Kim DH, Ryu KS, Kim MK, Park CK (2007) Factors influencing segmental range of motion after lumbar total disc replacement using the ProDisc II prosthesis. J Neurosurg Spine 7(2):131-8

 

Krämer J, Kleinert H, Senge A, Rubenthaler F (2005) Artificial discs: review, current status, outlook. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 143(3):281-6

 

Leahy M, Zigler JE, Ohnmeiss DD, et al. (2008) Comparison of results of total disc replacement in postdiscectomy patients versus patients with no previous lumbar surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33(15):1690-3; discussion 1694-5

 

LeHuec JC, Kiaer T, Friesem T, et al. (2003) Shock absorption in lumbar disc prosthesis: a preliminary mechanical study. J Spinal Disord Tech 16(4):346-51

 

Leivseth G, Braaten S, Frobin W, Brinckmann P (2006) Mobility of lumbar segments instrumented with a ProDisc II prosthesis: a two-year follow-up study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31(15):1726-33

 

Levin DA, Bendo JA, Quirno M, et al. (2007) Comparative charge analysis of one- and two-level lumbar total disc arthroplasty versus circumferential lumbar fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32(25):2905-9

 

Lim MR, Girardi FP, Zhang K, Huang RC, et al. (2005) Measurement of total disc replacement radiographic range of motion: a comparison of two techniques. J Spinal Disord Tech 18(3):252-6

 

Lim MR, Loder RT, Huang RC, et al. (2006) Measurement error of lumbar total disc replacement range of motion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31(10):E291-7

 

Mathew P, Blackman M, Redla S, Hussein AA (2005) Bilateral pedicle fractures following anterior dislocation of the polyethylene inlay of a ProDisc artificial disc replacement: a case report of an unusual complication. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30(11):E311-4

 

Mayer HM (2001) Discogenic low back pain and degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis - how appropriate is surgical treatment? Schmerz 15(6):484-91

 

Mayer HM (2005) Degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine Total disc replacement as an alternative to lumbar fusion? Orthopade 34(10):1007-14, 1016-20

 

Meyers KN, Campbell DA, Lipman JD, et al. (2007) Dynamics of an intervertebral disc prosthesis in human cadaveric spines. HSS J 3(2):164-8

 

Mirovsky Y, Shalmon E, Halpern Z, et al. (2008) Lumbar disk replacement with the ProDisc prosthesis. Orthopedics 31(2):133

 

Ogon M, Howanietz N, Tuschel A, et al. (2007) Implantation of the ProDisc intervertebral disk prosthesis for the lumbar spine. Oper Orthop Traumatol 19(2):209-30

 

Panjabi M, Henderson G, Abjornson C, Yue J (2007) Multidirectional testing of one- and two-level ProDisc-L versus simulated fusions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32(12):1311-9

 

Park CK, Ryu KS, Jee WH (2008) Degenerative changes of discs and facet joints in lumbar total disc replacement using ProDisc II: minimum two-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33(16):1755-61

 

Park SA, Ordway NR, Fayyazi AH, et al. (2009) Comparison of Cobb technique, quantitative motion analysis, and radiostereometric analysis in measurement of segmental range of motions after lumbar total disc arthroplasty. J Spinal Disord Tech 22(8):602-9

 

Patel VV, Estes S, Lindley EM, Burger E (2008) Lumbar spinal fusion versus anterior lumbar disc replacement: the financial implications. J Spinal Disord Tech 21(7):473-6

 

Rawlinson JJ, Punga KP, Gunsallus KL, et al. (2007) Wear simulation of the ProDisc-L disc replacement using adaptive finite element analysis. J Neurosurg Spine 7(2):165-73

 

Rohlmann A, Zander T, Bergmann G (2005) Effect of total disc replacement with ProDisc on intersegmental rotation of the lumbar spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30(7):738-43

 

Rognsvåg T, Strand LI, Skouen JS (2007) Pain and functional ability in patients with total disc replacement in the lumbar spine. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 127(9):1188-91

 

Rosen C, Kiester PD, Lee TQ (2009) Lumbar disk replacement failures: review of 29 patients and rationale for revision. Orthopedics: 32(8)

 

Rousseau MA, Bradford DS, Bertagnoli R, et al. (2006) Disc arthroplasty design influences intervertebral kinematics and facet forces. Spine J 6(3):258-66

 

Rundell SA, Auerbach JD, Balderston RA, Kurtz SM (2008) Total disc replacement positioning affects facet contact forces and vertebral body strains. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33(23):2510-7

 

Schroven I, Dorofey D (2006) Intervertebral prosthesis versus anterior lumbar interbody fusion: one-year results of a prospective non-randomised study. Acta Orthop Belg 72(1):83-6

 

Schulte TL, Lerner T, Hackenberg L, et al. (2007) Acquired spondylolysis after implantation of a lumbar ProDisc II prosthesis: case report and review of the literature. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32(22):E645-8

 

Shim CS, Lee S, Maeng DH, Lee SH (2005) Vertical split fracture of the vertebral body following total disc replacement using ProDisc: report of two cases. J Spinal Disord Tech 18(5):465-9

 

Shim CS, Lee SH, Shin HD, et al. (2007) CHARITE versus ProDisc: a comparative study of a minimum 3-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32(9):1012-8

 

Siepe CJ, Hitzl W, Meschede P, et al. (2009) Interdependence between disc space height, range of motion and clinical outcome in total lumbar disc replacement. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34(9):904-16

 

Siepe CJ, Korge A, Grochulla F, et al. (2008) Analysis of post-operative pain patterns following total lumbar disc replacement: results from fluoroscopically guided spine infiltrations. Eur Spine J 17(1):44-56

 

Siepe CJ, Mayer HM, Heinz-Leisenheimer M, Korge A (2007) Total lumbar disc replacement: different results for different levels. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32(7):782-90

 

Siepe CJ, Mayer HM, Wiechert K, Korge A (2006) Clinical results of total lumbar disc replacement with ProDisc II: three-year results for different indications. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31(17):1923-32

 

Siepe CJ, Tepass A, Hitzl W, et al. (2009) Dynamics of improvement following total lumbar disc replacement: is the outcome predictable? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34(23):2579-86

 

Stieber JR, Donald GD 3rd (2006) Early failure of lumbar disc replacement: case report and review of the literature. J Spinal Disord Tech 19(1):55-60

 

Tournier C, Aunoble S, Le Huec JC, et al. (2007) Total disc arthroplasty: consequences for sagittal balance and lumbar spine movement. Eur Spine J 16(3):411-21

 

Tropiano P, Huang RC, Girardi FP, et al. (2005) Lumbar total disc replacement. Seven to eleven-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87(3):490-6

 

Tropiano P, Huang RC, Girardi FP, et al. (2006) Lumbar total disc replacement. Surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88 Suppl 1 Pt 1:50-64

 

Tropiano P, Huang RC, Girardi FP, Marnay T (2003) Lumbar disc replacement: preliminary results with ProDisc II after a minimum follow-up period of 1 year. J Spinal Disord Tech 16(4):362-8

 

Vicars R, Hyde PJ, Brown TD, Tipper JL, Ingham E, Fisher J, Hall RM (2010) The effect of anterior-posterior shear load on the wear of ProDisc-L TDR. Eur Spine J 18:Epub

 

Yang CW, Liu L, Wang J, et al. (2009) Magnetic resonance imaging of artificial lumbar disks: safety and metal artifacts. Chin Med J (Engl) 122(8):911-6

 

Yaszay B, Bendo JA, Goldstein JA, et al. (2008) Effect of intervertebral disc height on postoperative motion and outcomes after ProDisc-L lumbar disc replacement. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33(5):508-12; discussion 513

 

Zander T, Rohlmann A, Bergmann G (2009) Influence of different artificial disc kinematics on spine biomechanics. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 24(2):135-42

 

Zhong ZC, Chen SH, Hung CH (2009) Load- and displacement-controlled finite element analyses on fusion and non-fusion spinal implants. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 223(2):143-57

 

Zigler JE (2003) Clinical results with ProDisc: European experience and U.S. investigation device exemption study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28(20):S163-6

 

Zigler JE (2004) Lumbar spine arthroplasty using the ProDisc II. Spine J 4(6 Suppl):260S-267S

 

Zigler J, Delamarter R, Spivak JM, et al. (2007) Results of the prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-L total disc replacement versus circumferential fusion for the treatment of 1-level degenerative disc disease. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32(11):1155-62; discussion 1163

 

Zigler JE, Burd TA, Vialle EN, et al. (2003) Lumbar spine arthroplasty: early results using the ProDisc II: a prospective randomized trial of arthroplasty versus fusion. J Spinal Disord Tech 16(4):352-61